|
|
Post by IronWolves on Nov 16, 2007 15:18:07 GMT -5
you didnt spray paint my name
|
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on Nov 16, 2007 15:57:21 GMT -5
oops sorry where are you?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kazzerland on Nov 16, 2007 16:06:36 GMT -5
We'll decide if you get to claim the land through a UR vote.  Kazzerland Results: 4 FOR 2 AGAINST |
|
|
|
Post by krayfish on Nov 16, 2007 16:19:02 GMT -5
The UR demands you stop all nuclear weapons technology and disband all nuclear missiles, also recouperate owtopia for all losses from your nuking. Any other demands fellow senators? k |
|
|
|
Post by krayfish on Nov 16, 2007 16:23:08 GMT -5
The UR demands you stop all nuclear weapons technology and disband all nuclear missiles, also recouperate owtopia for all losses from your nuking. Any other demands fellow senators? |
|
|
|
Post by Casinecro on Nov 16, 2007 17:38:40 GMT -5
Well, as for the whole "patroling" thing, it's a good idea, but it's kind of a bad way to give some nations a good way to attack from within. Plus it's kind of an invasion of national privacy. Maybe we could only patrol nations that let us, and be wary of the ones that don't...
@ Krayfish: And as for paying back Owtopia, repairing damage from a carpet nuking is, as you said before, most or all of your money. Just in case that changes your mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on Nov 16, 2007 18:38:09 GMT -5
If you are against it Casinecro say no.
Yea: 10
Nay: 2
|
|
|
|
Post by IronWolves on Nov 16, 2007 20:04:40 GMT -5
how many senators do we get?
yea:4
nay:2
|
|
|
|
Post by Casinecro on Nov 16, 2007 20:06:02 GMT -5
I never said I was against it, I just said we should tweak the idea a bit. So, I'm not gonna really vote. And besides, aren't most or all of the active nations in the UR? I mean, I'm pretty sure the way I read that is that we'll patrol the inactive nations, but for the sake of role-playing, isn't that kind of pointless?
|
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on Nov 16, 2007 21:29:29 GMT -5
yea: 14
nay: 4
Its brings in more tax payers to help the UR, and my take over of Kaleckton will get me, a founder, more to help with the UR.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kazzerland on Nov 17, 2007 0:20:19 GMT -5
I see both sides of the "debate" but eh, let's let Democracy decide. And it seems that Primus' ideas will be put into action.
|
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on Nov 17, 2007 12:59:02 GMT -5
Wooo I own Kaleckton now I guess!
I shall begin the invasion on Automaticz.
Let an era of glory ring out! The Federation of Primus Kaleckton is here!
|
|
|
|
Post by Kardas on Nov 18, 2007 11:42:50 GMT -5
okay! So is that 6 yeas from the CIW? Only if the country keeps its name and guarantees the rights of the penguins- Otherwise, 6 nays |
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on Nov 19, 2007 7:07:08 GMT -5
Okay then, it shall keep its name and the rights of penguins but can the UR own the land itself?
|
|
|
|
Post by Casinecro on Nov 19, 2007 13:48:11 GMT -5
You know, maybe we should put a section of land dedicated stricly to the UR? I mean, if Primus is taking over all this land, maybe we should just have the official "United Republic Grand Senate Hall" which would be a huge, bigger, fancier version of the UR buildings in all our countries, but it would be official. Kinda like how The Hauge has the World Court (I think).
|
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on Nov 19, 2007 14:42:52 GMT -5
perhaps
|
|
|
|
Post by Kardas on Nov 20, 2007 10:29:57 GMT -5
@ Primus: Automaticz will be ruled by the UR, but the Automaticz government gets considerable say. If you agree, 6 yays from the CIW
@ Casinecro: not a bad point, but my Dutch pride forces me to tell you that it's spelled The Hague (though the REAL name is 's Gravenhage, or Den Haag)
|
|
|
|
Post by owtopia on Nov 20, 2007 12:25:57 GMT -5
Owtopia vote
6 yays
|
|
|
|
Post by Casinecro on Nov 20, 2007 12:55:46 GMT -5
I don't think I'll vote on this one, but I'll go either way.
@kardas: Sorry, that's just the way I was taught to spell/say it. Didn't mean to offend your honour. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by owtopia on Nov 20, 2007 13:02:52 GMT -5
You just spelled honor wrong.
|
|
