Post by Archaix on Sept 13, 2007 14:03:23 GMT -5
There you go.
- I've refrained from 'other' but added 'apathetic' (which I stole from Facebook).
- Social Democratic is loosely what the Democratic Party is. 'Liberal', in reality, means either social liberal or economic liberal. So you could say both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party are liberals.
- I've made a distinction between racist and non-racist fascists. This isn't strictly standard but I feel there is a difference.
- Likewise, I've made a distinction between the left-wing. There simply isn't enough time to distinguish between Trotskyists, Stalinists, Eurocommunists and Leninists, and it would be messy anyway. If you're pro revolutions, you go in one camp, if you're not, you go in another.
- 'Why is Evolutionary not Social Democratic?' Because social democracy does not necessarily imply the economic concerns socialists have.
- I've refrained from 'other' but added 'apathetic' (which I stole from Facebook).
- Social Democratic is loosely what the Democratic Party is. 'Liberal', in reality, means either social liberal or economic liberal. So you could say both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party are liberals.
- I've made a distinction between racist and non-racist fascists. This isn't strictly standard but I feel there is a difference.
- Likewise, I've made a distinction between the left-wing. There simply isn't enough time to distinguish between Trotskyists, Stalinists, Eurocommunists and Leninists, and it would be messy anyway. If you're pro revolutions, you go in one camp, if you're not, you go in another.
- 'Why is Evolutionary not Social Democratic?' Because social democracy does not necessarily imply the economic concerns socialists have.
Electioneering.
" -Archaix