|
|
II. Law
Oct 5, 2008 12:46:07 GMT -5
Post by Neo Nibu on Oct 5, 2008 12:46:07 GMT -5
II. Law of International Nations
Polling Rights of the King
The King has the right to set up polls for elections, amendments, and any other insistent that requires a vote.
Under any of the fallowing conditions;
-no active Head of Senate
-to speed up the process of legislating an amendment deemed important to the development of the region
I have passed this new law as we have no Head of Senate and will have a need for voting. Come to think of it not sure why I didn't include it in the constitutional Monarchy document to begin with.
|
|
|
|
Post by Teivostan on Oct 6, 2008 7:21:01 GMT -5
Seems like a good idea to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kardas on Oct 6, 2008 8:07:04 GMT -5
glad you found that. must have been an oversight in the document.
|
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 7, 2008 16:17:10 GMT -5
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Oct 7, 2008 16:17:10 GMT -5
Well i thought that came with a dictatorship or "monarchy" or "(word to make you feel better but basically counts for nothing) monarchy", but i don't get to vote on it anyway so meh.
Oh and i probaly would of supported it because it is like a back up incase the head of senate goes away, ulthough i would of liked it better under democracy.
|
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 7, 2008 16:45:58 GMT -5
Post by Neo Nibu on Oct 7, 2008 16:45:58 GMT -5
You know auto, there IS a difference between a constitutionally Monarchy and a dictatorship.
|
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 7, 2008 17:23:54 GMT -5
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Oct 7, 2008 17:23:54 GMT -5
You know auto, there IS a difference between a constitutionally Monarchy and a dictatorship. Yes there is, But its been warped now so that you have full power full stop, but there are government ministers to run things, which you could overule. |
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 8, 2008 13:16:25 GMT -5
Post by Neo Nibu on Oct 8, 2008 13:16:25 GMT -5
"government ministers to run things, which you could overule"
I don't have the power to overrule other government officials...
|
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 8, 2008 16:33:33 GMT -5
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Oct 8, 2008 16:33:33 GMT -5
"government ministers to run things, which you could overule" I don't have the power to overrule other government officials... -Can pass or change laws without senate approval, but cannot alter the constitution/“code” e.g Government Oficcial: Yay everyone can wear yellow again! King: *New Law Without A Vote* The wearing of yellow is banned *Also change that law to No one can wear yellow* |
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 8, 2008 20:38:18 GMT -5
Post by Neo Nibu on Oct 8, 2008 20:38:18 GMT -5
Your example is laughable.
There are only two laws in play, and one of them I put there. The other can't really be altered in anyway that wouldn't change the law all together.
And me altering a law isn't going over another official since no other official can make laws that go directly into play, they can only have them go up for a vote. Plus if I altered something negatively it can be over turned. On top of that, just because I could, doesn't mean I would. In no way would I do anything I thought would reflect negatively on me or have negative affect on the region. So just claim down, enjoy the regions new boost in size and new members.
|
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 15, 2008 18:30:56 GMT -5
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Oct 15, 2008 18:30:56 GMT -5
Your example is laughable. There are only two laws in play, and one of them I put there. The other can't really be altered in anyway that wouldn't change the law all together. And me altering a law isn't going over another official since no other official can make laws that go directly into play, they can only have them go up for a vote. Plus if I altered something negatively it can be over turned. On top of that, just because I could, doesn't mean I would. In no way would I do anything I thought would reflect negatively on me or have negative affect on the region. So just claim down, enjoy the regions new boost in size and new members. My example was simple if not a bit weird, you have ultimate veto power and yes the law can be reinstated but do you think all the dukes ect. will really want to go against you and loose power? I know our vetran dukes (Karadas and Teivo) probaly would but what happens when newer people come, not too known by the IN community and become dukes, it will happen as you need a certain number of dukes. " In no way would I do anything I thought would reflect negatively on me or have negative affect on the region." Sun King? Had a negative effect on both. And don't think for a second im talking crazy stuff, vetoing laws and having control over a large number of people making your word always law would be childs play considering what you have allready done. |
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 15, 2008 19:55:02 GMT -5
Post by Neo Nibu on Oct 15, 2008 19:55:02 GMT -5
"you have ultimate veto power"
No I don't... where does it say I have this?...
[" In no way would I do anything I thought would reflect negatively on me or have negative affect on the region."
Sun King? Had a negative effect on both.]
That was in the past, i'm referring to the now, I have no need to do such a thing as I already have what I want... and I was trying to help with the whole sunking thing although I did go about it all wrong.
I think you need to just relax, I've done good thus far, and I don't want to be King forever either.
|
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 16, 2008 15:25:07 GMT -5
Post by Teivostan on Oct 16, 2008 15:25:07 GMT -5
Have there been Dukes appointed? I thought it was only government positions so far...
|
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 16, 2008 19:46:47 GMT -5
Post by Neo Nibu on Oct 16, 2008 19:46:47 GMT -5
Yea I haven't gotten around to appointing them yet, I wanted to appoint all three at once and only really have two in mind (Kardas and Teivo).
|
|
|
|
II. Law
Oct 17, 2008 7:10:11 GMT -5
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Oct 17, 2008 7:10:11 GMT -5
Oh i thought dukes were appointed allready
|
|
