|
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Jun 9, 2007 14:01:13 GMT -5
I think we should do something about all the inactive nations now, Alida & Syren has been UN Delegate for a while now when she said that she wants the other post. I Think we should warn them and if they don't reply within 5 days then we can kick them out or I could found a new region and everyone could move there. it is better to have a small region where all members are active than a big nations where only a few are active.
|
|
|
Post by Neo Nibu on Jun 9, 2007 15:06:22 GMT -5
Or eveyone could join Japanada.
lol, I don't think we need to refound the region, or boot inactive nations. I agree, we don't want someone inactive as delegte, just un-endorse them.
|
|
|
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Jun 9, 2007 15:19:09 GMT -5
I now think that we should re-found the region or boot inactive nations, all the inactive nations indorsements is sort of messing with our government because you can't be UN Delegate if you hold a post but the inactive nations are not active enough to go on the forum or anything. If we re-founded the nation we would keep the forum (duh) but we would have to change some things about it and tell our allies but im sure we could do that. if we chose to boot inactive nations then we could put it in the factbook saying if you have not said that you won't be on NS for a while and you have not been on for around 15 days then you will be booted.
|
|
|
Post by Neo Nibu on Jun 9, 2007 15:35:28 GMT -5
Inactive members, are annoying, but I don't think we should just boot them all. Having them in the region helps keep us stable. And on top of that, if we refounded, we'd have to go through and change all the 'International Nations' in our government documents to the new regions name. Also, If we re-found the region, I say we hold a vote on who does the refounding, that be more democratic. And i'm not just saying that because I'd like to be the founder, I don't think i'd win.
|
|
|
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Jun 9, 2007 15:40:32 GMT -5
No if it was re-founding i would re-found a founder can't be replaced that can't be voted on at all.
|
|
|
Post by Neo Nibu on Jun 9, 2007 15:42:18 GMT -5
A founder can be replaced easy i've seen it before. I'm against refounding it at all, but I think if we do, it only makes sence to hold a vote.
|
|
|
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Jun 9, 2007 15:44:18 GMT -5
I am not saying we should re-found i am just saying i will not be replaced, i founded this nation and no one else can do that for this nation so im sure you will see why i don't wan't to be replaced by someone why didn't even found the region.
|
|
|
Post by Neo Nibu on Jun 9, 2007 15:50:19 GMT -5
I now think that we should re-found the region You said you wanted to refound... I know why you don't want to be replaced, and I don't think you would be, but it's more democratic to vote.
|
|
|
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Jun 9, 2007 15:54:24 GMT -5
I said re-found OR boot inactive nations! I really don't want to be replaced by someone who did not found the region! I founded this region so I should be the only one that can be founder.
|
|
|
Post by Neo Nibu on Jun 9, 2007 16:18:46 GMT -5
Well, I still think we should include other peoples opinions on who should be the founder.
I don't think we should do either.
|
|
|
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Jun 9, 2007 16:36:05 GMT -5
Founder is who made the region, I made the region, no one else can replace me because i founded this region.
|
|
|
Post by Neo Nibu on Jun 9, 2007 17:07:22 GMT -5
You keep repeating yourself... People should have the right to choice who should refound the region if we choice to refound it.
|
|
|
Post by deutschgarten on Jun 9, 2007 17:53:47 GMT -5
Maybe.
But we aren't refounding are we? That just seems like a waste of time to me. If you want to get away from inactive members than just boot them!
|
|
|
Post by Robespierre - P.R. of Debro on Jun 10, 2007 5:40:37 GMT -5
Maybe. But we aren't refounding are we? That just seems like a waste of time to me. +1 for that. ppl will join larger regions. A region with 8-9 members.....i don't think so.
|
|
|
Post by His Holiness King Of Penguins on Jun 10, 2007 13:20:45 GMT -5
well should we boot inactive members?
|
|
|
Post by Neo Nibu on Jun 10, 2007 16:59:27 GMT -5
No, the bigger our region the better, even if we have alot of inactive nations.
|
|
|
Post by Robespierre - P.R. of Debro on Jun 11, 2007 1:40:18 GMT -5
indeed
|
|
|
Post by deutschgarten on Jun 11, 2007 11:44:56 GMT -5
Oh and back to the original topic; vote on which of the two amendments you want!
|
|