|
|
Post by owtopia on Nov 11, 2007 10:12:37 GMT -5
I think that as long as the user doesn't go overboard, it is okay.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kazzerland on Nov 11, 2007 10:13:55 GMT -5
There is already a rule against them. No need to take a vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by owtopia on Nov 11, 2007 10:16:03 GMT -5
I want to see who ACTUALLY agrees with that rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by Casinecro on Nov 11, 2007 11:27:40 GMT -5
While I don't really see anything wrong with it, Kazzer does have a point. It's already a rule, so we don't have any real reason to vote. You said before that the reason you couldn't have it was because it's an unfair advantage over everyone else. But, it's not my fault that noone else thought of it. But, that's all I'm gonna say, and I'll just say that we don't have no orbital strike weapon.
|
|
|
|
Post by IronWolves on Nov 11, 2007 11:32:26 GMT -5
well as much fun as it would be to orbital strike something i would not like to be hit by an orbital strike weapon so i'm not voting on this matter
|
|
|
|
Post by Casinecro on Nov 11, 2007 11:36:49 GMT -5
Well, nobody nescissarily wants to get shot either, but that's the point of a weapon of death.
And also, does this mean I don't have a space navy anymore? In my national stats you said I could.
|
|
|
|
Post by krayfish on Nov 11, 2007 12:11:03 GMT -5
first you spelled no one noone and yea there is already a law for this so why does it matter
|
|
|
|
Post by Casinecro on Nov 11, 2007 14:00:51 GMT -5
It doesn't matter. It's the INTERNET. Nobody cares if you have bad spelling. The only reason Kazzerland urges you to use spell check is because this forum is supossed to be somewhat dignified. As long as you can get the point across and your sentances arent something like
L0l dud,U goit pwnd lollololololololl rofl n00b i am teh 1337 haxorz uz cant beet mez awsome scorz lolololololol roflmao lolol
then nobody cares. And besides, you can spell it either way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Northern Australis on Nov 11, 2007 14:09:07 GMT -5
IDK about this I mean isn't this RPG takes place present day? I mean orbital weapons wont happen after like 500 years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Casinecro on Nov 11, 2007 15:10:51 GMT -5
Well yes, it does, but we also probably won't have robo soldiers and anti-missile forcefields any time soon. The rule is basicly (and we had a poll) fi you put enough money into something, and it's somewhat realistic, and approved by the RPG cheif, then it's ok.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kazzerland on Nov 11, 2007 15:40:10 GMT -5
Yes force-fields are against the rules. That's why no one has one. They have anti-missile defense systems. America has one...lots of places do. The robo-soldiers are a little far advanced, but they're not impossible to destroy so whatever. No space navies, for now. Maybe in time, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kardas on Nov 11, 2007 21:56:42 GMT -5
And don't forget the odd national animal of my country  |
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on Nov 12, 2007 6:35:08 GMT -5
There are a Real Life type robo-soldier, the Isreali Airforce I know for a fact has unmanned planes. Also, I had robo soldiers for a long time, Kaleckton was a smart man and he was fine with them. I don't like orbital strike weapons (maybe only allow people to take space shuttles for "paratrooper" type drop, but weapons? not at this time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kazzerland on Nov 12, 2007 16:19:29 GMT -5
Yes I'm also perfectly fine with the robo-soldiers. Just as long as you don't make them too powerful...  |
|
|
|
Post by IronWolves on Nov 12, 2007 16:35:52 GMT -5
i didnt vote because i dont want to say never b/c they could be put in over time
|
|
|
|
Post by Kardas on Nov 13, 2007 8:01:59 GMT -5
good point. But I'm keeping with the responsibility thing. As long as no one's destroying cities with giant laser beams from above I'm fine
|
|
