|
Post by Kazzerland on May 17, 2008 18:34:52 GMT -5
Well what do you think? I'll give my argument once people begin to vote and give their own opinions.
|
|
|
Post by Teivostan on May 17, 2008 19:33:38 GMT -5
My beliefs are somewhere between Democratic Socialism and a Regulated Economy.
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on May 17, 2008 21:10:49 GMT -5
I regret to inform you Kazzer, that true Communism is Anarchist. Communism is meant to be a community of people banding together with others. Dictatorships... a no no, then its called State Capitalism.
Also
In Socialism there is currency, regulated economy, some land ownership, but everyone is payed the same.
In Communism there is no currency, you work your hardest and you get rewarded with that work.
|
|
|
Post by Robespierre - P.R. of Debro on May 18, 2008 8:10:14 GMT -5
primus is right, "Communism is a socioeconomic structure that promotes the establishment of a classless, stateless society based on common ownership of the means of production."
and you're generally mixing up the definitions. Economicaly, you can choose between to orientation, the neo-liberal approach(free market, "small" government, minimal redistribution and minimal taxes) or the socdem approach(regulated market, "provider" government, significant redistribution and significant taxes)
Actually, "communist" states like China are on the neo-liberal side. You won't find any true communist state, nor a pure capitalist one.
|
|
|
Post by Kazzerland on May 18, 2008 9:46:31 GMT -5
Well I am not going by the definition, I am going by the ways that these systems of government have been displayed. Think about the USSR, they were certainly a dictatorship. They simply lied to their people and told them that the Government was equal to them.
|
|
|
Post by Archaix on May 18, 2008 10:21:38 GMT -5
I would have gone with:
Communism Partial Nationalization Regulated Capitalistic Unregulated Capitalistic
Economics is separate from social, in that a country could hypothetically be an unregulated capitalist machine and not turn into a police-state, in the same way a communist state might (we hope) be noninvasive and democratic.
'Dictatorship' is a technically correct term; in all the early writing you'll see 'dictatorship of the proletariat', but it doesn't mean the same as what you think it does. It comes straight from the Latin 'dictat', as in, 'the speaker'. The people speak for themselves. It has nothing to do with a single ruler in the slightest.
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on May 18, 2008 11:40:49 GMT -5
The dictator of the proletariat (which btw would be everyone in a Communist state since all would be equal) would be an Athenian Democracy if it could be defined as a government.
|
|
|
Post by Kardas on May 18, 2008 11:49:04 GMT -5
I'm mostly for democratic socialism. I'm one of the more centrist members of COIN
|
|
|
Post by Archaix on May 18, 2008 14:32:08 GMT -5
I'm mostly for democratic socialism. I'm one of the more centrist members of COIN Except when he drinks too much. @ Republicas: How so? I suppose there would be similarities, but the Athenians disenfranchised slaves, women, foreigners and so on. Also, the process of direct democracy worked because it was applicable to a single city; communism would be a national action. Unless you're talking about council communism/soviet system, which would create lots of local points of authority.
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on May 18, 2008 14:37:36 GMT -5
Sorry forgot the term, direct democracy. To be honest I'm not certain yet how Communism will work, I can work out Socialism but not Communism
|
|
|
Post by silvado on May 19, 2008 17:34:10 GMT -5
I like the idea of a middle ground between regulated economy and democratic socialism. I don't really know much in depth stuff about this topic compared to others but I know that the economy should definately have some forms of regulations on it.
|
|
|
Post by Archaix on May 24, 2008 13:14:56 GMT -5
I believe that all the most important resources (coal, oil, gas, heavy industries) as well as big social aspects of the country (healthcare and education) should be under total governmental control, while business, while regulated, should be independently run, the way they work best. But that's economics. Socially I believe in equality: equality in voting, equality in civil rights and as near to equality in pay as possible. And brown fedoras for all.
|
|
|
Post by Republicas Gloria on May 24, 2008 16:59:54 GMT -5
lol
|
|
|
Post by Robespierre - P.R. of Debro on May 28, 2008 10:41:58 GMT -5
As you wish edit:now wit special, exciting tinypic effects: " View My TinyFx"
|
|
|
Post by Archaix on May 28, 2008 13:37:23 GMT -5
It's on the wrong way.
|
|
|
Post by Kardas on May 29, 2008 10:35:59 GMT -5
I'm impressed!
|
|
|
Post by Archaix on May 29, 2008 11:57:30 GMT -5
Impressed at my hair-ridden photograph or Debro's unique photoshopping technique that he pioneered by smashing his head onto his keyboard until his computer produced an image?
|
|
|
Post by silvado on May 29, 2008 20:33:59 GMT -5
I like your point Archaix, and nice job Debro. That is a sic photo
|
|
|
Post by Robespierre - P.R. of Debro on May 30, 2008 5:45:05 GMT -5
Impressed at my hair-ridden photograph or Debro's unique photoshopping technique that he pioneered by smashing his head onto his keyboard until his computer produced an image? you're so hostile but touché, the procedure was something similar, with the exception of the gimpshopping technique.
|
|
|
Post by Neo Nibu on May 30, 2008 13:24:51 GMT -5
Socialism vs. Capitalism? Eh their both flawed...
The best would be for one nation of earth with no active authority or laws of any form. A brotherhood of man, living in balance with nature. A removal of material possessions and formal careers, live life as it was meant to be lived.
|
|